Sustainability Report
Embodied carbon
Afterlife
Yes. Adaptive reuse was a key consideration in the renovation.
The project was conceived not only as a home for a specific family, but as a flexible framework capable of evolving over time. The preservation of the modernist structural grid, together with the introduction of open-plan social areas and patios, allows the layout to accommodate alternative uses in the future—such as a small office, studio, or even multi-generational living.
Service cores (kitchen, bathrooms, laundry) were consolidated to free the remaining areas, giving the plan a non-hierarchical, adaptable character. This strategy ensures that walls and partitions can be reconfigured with minimal intervention, extending the useful life of the house and reducing the need for future demolitions or resource-intensive transformations.
In this sense, the project operates as a living laboratory: a resilient architectural platform designed for changing programs, evolving family structures, and new modes of inhabiting space.
Yes. Several building elements were designed or selected with disassembly and reuse in mind.
Lightweight interior partitions, furniture, and shelving systems were conceived as modular components that can be removed or reconfigured without affecting the structural integrity of the house. Materials such as wood paneling, metal frames, and independent cabinetry can be dismantled and reused in other contexts, extending their life cycle.
In addition, the project deliberately preserved the original modernist concrete structure and brickwork, reducing demolition waste and ensuring that new interventions remain reversible. This approach allows many of the added elements to eventually enter the circular economy, either through reuse within the same home or by being relocated elsewhere.