Syn-axes

Mariana Bisti

• Architects

Derived from the term “synaxis” (<σύναξις,greek)-a gathering of people in a predetermined space—the design proposal emphasizes spatial coexistence and interaction.

photo_credit Mariana Bisti — Mariana Bisti

The project involves the design of two ground-floor residences in Rio, Achaia, intended to accommodate different members of the same family. The central design challenge was to reconcile two seemingly opposing demands: on the one hand, the creation of fluid spatial connections that encourage communication and shared experiences among the residents; on the other, the clear delineation of boundaries that safeguard the privacy and autonomy of each dwelling.

The essence of the design lies in the semantic and functional transformation of an original single residence into two autonomous yet interconnected units. This spatial intervention reflects the inherent dipole between privacy and connection, articulated through carefully designed thresholds, transitional zones, and shared areas.

Rather than fragmenting the whole, the division establishes a dialogue between the two dwellings, allowing individuality while maintaining a sense of belonging. In this way, the concept of “synaxis” is materialized: a common framework that unites without homogenizing, enabling coexistence through both separation and overlap.

The layout of the residences was shaped both by the design principles and the rectangular geometry of the plot. Two conceptual axes—horizontal and vertical—organize the plan: the horizontal axis defines the public zone of communication, while the vertical axis delineates the private domain of retreat and quiet.

Following this logic, the two residences are organized so that the living areas (living room, kitchen, dining) unfold along the horizontal axis, reinforcing connection and visual continuity, while the bedrooms align with the vertical axis, enhancing privacy. Together, these axes form an imaginary cruciform system: a horizontal zone of communication (syn-axis) and a vertical zone of retreat, intersecting without negating one another.

In House A, this duality is further emphasized by two exposed concrete walls, which accentuate the perception of the axes. Their raw materiality contrasts with the white thermal façade, making them dominant architectural elements that underline the dialogue between material and semantic separation.

Ultimately, the proposal frames contemporary dwelling as a dynamic gathering — a balance of proximity and autonomy, of the personal and the communal.