Archello Awards 2025: Open for Entries! Submit your best projects now.
Archello Awards 2025: Open for Entries!
Submit your best projects now.

NY Times Building Lobby Garden

NY Times Building Lobby Garden

PROJECT STATEMENT The New York Times Building Lobby Garden emerges as a minimalist courtyard design in one of New York's densest neighborhoods. The plant material chosen simulates the Hudson River Valley woodland landscape revealing a simple, yet elegant design, a quiet, contemplative space, in contrast to the activity in the building. Precedent setting, microclimatic computer simulations were utilized to scientifically identify and forecast growing conditions that informed a carefully calibrated design solution.


PROJECT PURPOSE Create an iconic courtyard design with which The New York Times building would be identified. Capitalize on its central architectural transparent qualities to introduce the restorative powers of Nature where the garden’s elements incite and nurture the senses of the building’s tenants and strolling visitors.


LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ROLE Fulfill the aspirations of the New York Times, the building’s developer, Forest City Ratner and the design architect’s concept for a unique courtyard design that functions as a multi-layered backdrop within a 360 degree public space perspective. Research and simulate microclimatic conditions for supporting mature trees in a partially shaded courtyard. Establish an appropriately scaled garden design that requires low landscape management care and is ensured by a project specific landscape management manual.


SPECIAL FACTORS Context In New York City’s Time Square neighborhood, the 1.5 million-square-foot glass and steel complex showcases a 70-foot square open-air cube that reveals a woodland garden both from its 3-sided street exposure and from within the building. Set directly over Manhattan Schist bedrock, the garden remains as an environmental artifact as the site’s only unexcavated area. The building’s transparent qualities enable Nature and its seasonal attributes to be revealed at the building’s core and its surrounding streetscape. Consequently, the garden has evolved and earned a reputation as a popular memorable neighborhood and City destination.


Analysis Microclimatic conditions were measured through pioneering 3-D computer modeling simulations of seasonal solar radiation levels, wind velocities and temperature variations to identify human comfort influences, growing conditions and horticultural limitations well in advance of the courtyard‘s built form. These scientific findings demonstrated the exact location for planting trees and groundcover.


Design Evolution The architect initially envisioned a formal bosque; however, solar analysis simulations revealed that a uniform stand of trees would not perform evenly, nor be sustainable. Following the completion of the micro-climatic solar studies, it became evident that mature trees would only flourish in the garden’s northwest corner where sufficient sunlight was available. Coincidentally, a block of 45 foot tall multi-stemmed Paper Birches were discovered at a nearby New Jersey nursery where their size and shape masterfully fulfilled spatial and visual intentions and most importantly growing conditions at specific garden locations. By graphically superimposing the Birches’ photographic image into garden illustrations, immediate client group consensus was achieved on how the trees satisfied scale, seasonal diversity, regional landscape reference, sense of timelessness, and horticultural science criteria. With their mature height, the Birch canopies absorb more sunlight then specimens half their age. The presentation of the grouping of white-bark trunks was enhanced through their emergence from a rolling mounds serving as a direct counterpoint to the lobby’s surrounding level floor. Perceived as a ‘garden mat,’ a uniform emerald woodland ground cover carpet brings into focus the garden’s topography and activates the senses. A woodland grass punctuated with a scattering of native ferns, provides a cohesive ground plane for the Birch copse and thrives in the garden’s varying levels of deep shade and moisture conditions.


Installation Recognizing the rarity of the discovery of the 25-year-old 45 foot plus tall Birch trees, the client group was convinced to prepurchase the trees early in the design process. What turned out to be a much longer time in the nursery than originally forecasted, for over 6 years the trees underwent a preparatory root pruning and biological rootball feeding inoculation program to minimize potential transplant shock. Strict scheduling and coordination with building construction, street closure, tree delivery and usage of the largest single crane in the NY-Metro region was required to hoist each 32,000 pound tree over the 70-foot building facade into their specific pre-determined locations and elevations within the garden. Each tree was allocated a number and assigned to their specific final location and orientation based on their distinguishing physical characteristics.


Site Management For the long-term sustainability, a landscape management program and protocol was developed to ensure consistent and well coordinated care between the trees and the groundcovers. The program included specific seasonal maintenance needs, citing biological methods of care for soils, the Birches, ground covers, and irrigation regulation. Organic methods for building and maintaining healthy soil biology with a balance of beneficial fungi, bacteria and microorganisms were developed and coordinated with an organic pest-control program to combat susceptibility to the Bronze Birch Borer. Two distinct water irrigation systems were zoned and integrated to satisfy the Birch trees and woodland ground covers’ different moisture needs. Separate seasonal water distribution levels are regularly monitored and adjusted.


DESIGN INNOVATION As a counterpoint to its dense, bustling Times Square neighborhood, the garden’s location reveals a serene, fragment of the Hudson River Valley woodland landscape at the heart of this man-made construct. The bold simplicity of a minimalist design ethos creates a restrained visual abstraction, relying on only three plant types which harmonize rather than compete with the building’s design elements. The garden is comprised of three primary elements: tree grove, undulating topographic surface and floating path.


Scale and Spatial Layering — A grove of seven 50-foot-tall multi-stem Paper Birch trees (Betula papyrifera) and a rolling carpet of Berkeley Sedge (Carex divulsa), punctuated with Autumn Ferns (Dryopteris erythrosora), register a contrasting sculptural relief modulating three feet above and below the level plane of the building lobby’s White Oak floor and a certified IPE timber walkway. The species selection of the emerald carpet of sedges and ferns represents extensive research to prove their robust versatility to perform as a low growing uniform evergreen ground plane that compliments the artful movement of the rolling topography and its aesthetic compatibility with a woodland Birch grove. The inter-relationship of plants with their contrasting leaf colors and textures incite memorable native landscapes while establishing a unique composition against the building’s geometric matrix and the lobby’s bold shades of red and marigold yellow. The wooden footbridge transects the sculpted topography and provides the only means of accessibility and connection that reinforces the garden’s serenity established within the sensitivity of the non-accessible woodland space.


Seasonal/Temporal Diversity — The garden addresses interest in all seasons. Spring - white snowdrops, Summer - green sedges and ferns highlighting the undulating mounds, Fall - yellow leaves of the Birch trees, Winter - the powdery white tree trunks and the snow covered mounds. A diverse collection of regional bird wildlife enlivens the garden further by highlighting the changes in bird species’ migratory patterns and their seasonal locale preferences.


Ecological Sustainability — A layered web of planting infrastructure knits the garden with the building and the ground while enabling the continuous development of healthy endemic soil biology. An engineered soil was designed to regenerate endemic growing conditions for both the Birches and the Sedges. Soil profiles were developed to respond to the garden’s bedrock base and to meet the plant communities’ specific biological needs, ensuring enduring performance during each of its four seasons. Supplying the primary garden materials from local sources using a nursery less than 55 miles from the project site and engineering the soil at a plant in Long Island, substantially lowers the garden’s construction carbon footprint. The garden contains a moisture sensored computer-controlled irrigation system (with an integrated water de-chlorination system) that includes a separate subsurface apparatus for the trees and surface mist for the woodland carpet, which also aids in cooling the garden during hot summer periods. At first glance one could mistake the subtle design for that of a simple garden. The intelligence and infrastructure supporting it incorporate scientific research and best practice technological advancements critical to realizing and sustaining this urban courtyard garden. However invisible, the complexities of setting a stage for a living sanctuary, within an entirely manufactured setting, defines its creation in time.


PLANT LIST Paper Birch trees (Betula papyrifera) Berkeley Sedge (Carex divulsa) Autumn Ferns (Dryopteris erythrosora) Snowdrops (Galanthus nivalis)

Project credits

Landscape Architect

Project data

Project Year
2002
Share or Add NY Times Building Lobby Garden to your Collections